Regulations

⌘K

Regulatory Overview

NIS2 Directive

Cybersecurity requirements for essential and important entities.

Applicable

DORA

Operational resilience requirements for financial sector ICT providers.

Potentially applicable

EU AI Act

Governance and documentation requirements for AI systems.

Applicable

Applicable Regulations — Key Articles

NIS2 Directive Applicable

Article 21 — Cybersecurity Risk-Management Measures

Requires appropriate and proportionate technical, operational, and organisational measures to manage risks to network and information systems, including multi-factor authentication and encryption.

Article 23 — Reporting Obligations

Mandates early warning within 24 hours, incident notification within 72 hours, and final report within one month for significant incidents.

Article 29 — Cybersecurity Information-Sharing

Encourages voluntary cybersecurity information-sharing between entities and national authorities to improve collective resilience.

DORA Potentially applicable

Article 6 — ICT Risk Management Framework

Requires financial entities to establish a comprehensive ICT risk management framework covering identification, protection, detection, response, and recovery.

Article 11 — Business Continuity Planning

Mandates documented business continuity policies, response and recovery plans, and regular testing of ICT continuity arrangements.

Article 28 — Third-Party ICT Monitoring

Requires ongoing monitoring and oversight of third-party ICT service providers, including contractual provisions and exit strategies.

EU AI Act Applicable

Article 9 — AI Risk Management System

High-risk AI systems must have a risk management system that identifies, analyses, evaluates, and mitigates risks throughout the system lifecycle.

Article 11 — Technical Documentation

Requires comprehensive technical documentation for high-risk AI systems covering design, development, training data, performance metrics, and monitoring.

Article 14 — Human Oversight Requirements

High-risk AI systems must be designed to allow effective human oversight, including the ability to override, interrupt, or intervene in system outputs.

Regulatory Obligations

All NIS2 DORA AI Act
All Compliant Partial Missing
All Critical High Medium
All M. Kowalski T. Schmidt J. Dreyer L. Dubois
RegulationArticleObligationEvidencePriorityStatusOwnerAction
NIS2 Art. 21 Cybersecurity risk management 3 linked High Compliant M. Kowalski
NIS2 Art. 21 Multi-factor authentication 2 linked High Compliant T. Schmidt
NIS2 Art. 23 Incident reporting within 24h 1 linked Critical Partial M. Kowalski
NIS2 Art. 23 Incident root cause analysis 0 linked High Missing T. Schmidt
DORA Art. 5 ICT governance and organisation 1 linked High Partial M. Kowalski
DORA Art. 6 ICT risk management framework 1 linked High Partial T. Schmidt
DORA Art. 11 Business continuity planning 2 linked High Compliant J. Dreyer
DORA Art. 19 Cyber threat intelligence sharing 0 linked Medium Missing T. Schmidt
DORA Art. 25 ICT third-party testing 1 linked Medium Partial J. Dreyer
DORA Art. 28 Third-party ICT monitoring 0 linked High Missing T. Schmidt
AI Act Art. 9 AI risk management system 0 linked High Missing M. Kowalski
AI Act Art. 10 Data and data governance 0 linked High Missing T. Schmidt
AI Act Art. 11 Technical documentation 1 linked High Partial J. Dreyer
AI Act Art. 13 Transparency obligations 2 linked Medium Compliant L. Dubois
AI Act Art. 14 Human oversight requirements 0 linked High Missing M. Kowalski
AI Act Art. 52 Transparency for AI interaction 1 linked Medium Partial L. Dubois

Regulatory Insights

3
Regulations Active
16
Total Obligations
5
Compliant
7
Gaps to Address

Summary: Your organisation is actively tracking 3 EU regulations with 16 mapped obligations. 5 obligations are fully compliant, 4 are partially addressed, and 7 require immediate action — primarily in AI governance (AI Act Art. 9, 10, 14) and vendor risk management (DORA Art. 28). The highest priority gaps are incident reporting (NIS2 Art. 23) and third-party ICT monitoring (DORA Art. 28).